Poor people can’t bear it – Oxfam’s Polar Bears reject the US Climate offer

Oxfam’s Polar bears came back for a second visit to the Untied Nation Climate Change Conference in Bali, Indonesia today, as they could not believe that on the final day of the summit, there was still no clear agreement on a way forward to tackle climate change. You can watch a video of what they got up to on our YouTube Channel.

Oxfam at the annual meetings

by Elizabeth Stuart, Senior Policy Advisor and Head of Relations with World Bank and IMF Oxfam International
————————

In between briefing journalists clamouring for stories on the World Bank’s new president, following press conferences and briefings, and holding lobby meetings, Oxfam spoke at two important seminars yesterday. One was on health and education, and the other discussed the importance of both the World Bank and the IMF researching the likely impact of their advice on the poor, before they give it.

While doing this kind of impact assessment should be a no-brainer, and its also supposed to be the policy of both institutions, neither is doing it properly. The two World Bank spokespeople at the event disagreed on the subject: one said that NGOs are naive to call for this, while the other thanked NGOs for pushing the Bank to improve its practice. The IMF spokesperson agreed that this impact analysis is important, but said that there is not enough money to do it.

In other news Zoellick gave an interview to the Financial Times saying that companies will start giving money to the arm of the Bank that lends (or in most cases, gives) to the poorest countries, the International Development Association, or IDA. In the past only governments have contributed to IDA, so this would be a radical departure, even if the amounts of money were small. This raises some concerns, such as whether or not this will affect the accountability of the institution, and whether the money will be predictable. Aid money that is given in fits and starts is of limited use to developing countries who need to know how much money that have coming in before they can hire the much needed teachers and nurses. The Bank will need to answer questions about how this will work in practice – and soon.

For now the press room is quiet, with everyone waiting for the G7 finance ministers press conference this evening.

What a difference a Head makes

The world media focus in on G8 leaders / Oxfam Big Heads gambling with Africa’s future. Credit: Craig Owen / Oxfam International.
——————————————————————————————

Today was Oxfam’s G8 Gambling stunt. It was our first so to make sure we got the best spot we got up at 5am and were setting up at the rally site by 7.30am. There’s no doubt we arrived a little too early, as we spent the next 3 hours sitting and waiting for it all to start. Still, there’s nothing like being prepared – that’s what I say anyway.

US U turn on climate, German Aid increase announced

Dear All ,

Things continued to move fast yesterday afternoon and today on both elements of the G8 agenda, Climate Change and Africa. President Bush made a speech yesterday which touched on both Africa and Climate Change. On Africa he reiterated the $30 billion 5 year continuation of the PEPFAR HIV/AIDS programme, and also proposed $525 million over five years for education. On Climate Change he made a spectacular U turn, calling for a global target to reduce carbon dioxide emissions, something he has steadfastly refused to do for the past seven years. His turnaround on Climate Change was greated with muted suspicion however, as he also proposed that an alternative process of negotiations involving the biggest polluters, outside of the UN system, and he made no mention of the need to tie emmissions curbs to a specfic temperature goal- the central tenet of the German proposal for their G8.